Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIActivityIndicatorView support #131

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

UIActivityIndicatorView support #131

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

leonardoobaptistaa
Copy link

just added suport to UIActivityIndicatorView while image is downloading, if you like to add to the main project, here it is.

@rs rs closed this Nov 4, 2012
@nickdaugherty
Copy link

Bummer this isn't part of SDWebImage :( Would be very nice to have UIActivityIndicatorViews while images are loading out of the box, rather than adding another external repo or hacking something together.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 8, 2013

+1

3 similar comments
@anton-matosov
Copy link

+1

@vittoriom
Copy link

+1

@MartinHerman
Copy link

+1

@leonardoobaptistaa
Copy link
Author

Hey @MartinHerman ,
you can add this other project to your Podfile: https://github.com/JJSaccolo/UIActivityIndicator-for-SDWebImage

They don't want an activity indicator on the main project.

@bpoplauschi
Copy link
Member

Hi guys. Sorry it took so much, but I will reopen the pull request and think about this in the near future. Note: I briefly looked at the implementation from JJSaccolo and I would avoid having another set of setImageWithUrl methods just for the usingActivityIndicatorStyle param. That would make this library even harder to maintain. But maybe we can find some other way

@bpoplauschi bpoplauschi reopened this Sep 12, 2014
@bpoplauschi bpoplauschi added this to the 4.0.0 milestone Nov 5, 2014
@Nihility-Ming
Copy link

Create a category is nice idea. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants