You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried running the experiments and got the following scores by following this:
ATE_unadjusted: -0.2240035541871202
ATE_adjusted: -0.16479750378762317
However, the outputs from CausalBert.py seem to be closer to the ATE_unadjusted values (e.g., around -0.23 or -0.22).
I was under the impression that this model is designed to estimate ATE_adjusted, but based on these results, I am wondering if this is correct. Could you clarify whether CausalBert.py is intended to produce values closer to ATE_adjusted or if it aligns more with ATE_unadjusted?
Thank you for your time and for providing this great tool!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I tried running the experiments and got the following scores by following this:
ATE_unadjusted: -0.2240035541871202
ATE_adjusted: -0.16479750378762317
However, the outputs from CausalBert.py seem to be closer to the ATE_unadjusted values (e.g., around -0.23 or -0.22).
I was under the impression that this model is designed to estimate ATE_adjusted, but based on these results, I am wondering if this is correct. Could you clarify whether CausalBert.py is intended to produce values closer to ATE_adjusted or if it aligns more with ATE_unadjusted?
Thank you for your time and for providing this great tool!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: