Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarification on ATE estimates in CausalBert.py outputs #11

Open
tomatoboy-hub opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Clarification on ATE estimates in CausalBert.py outputs #11

tomatoboy-hub opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@tomatoboy-hub
Copy link

Hello,

I tried running the experiments and got the following scores by following this:
ATE_unadjusted: -0.2240035541871202
ATE_adjusted: -0.16479750378762317
However, the outputs from CausalBert.py seem to be closer to the ATE_unadjusted values (e.g., around -0.23 or -0.22).

I was under the impression that this model is designed to estimate ATE_adjusted, but based on these results, I am wondering if this is correct. Could you clarify whether CausalBert.py is intended to produce values closer to ATE_adjusted or if it aligns more with ATE_unadjusted?

Thank you for your time and for providing this great tool!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant