Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nesting of raw and verbatim is not handled properly for Jinja/Twig #1166

Closed
stof opened this issue Jun 11, 2019 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1552
Closed

Nesting of raw and verbatim is not handled properly for Jinja/Twig #1166

stof opened this issue Jun 11, 2019 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1552
Assignees
Labels
bugfix-request A request for a bugfix to be developed.

Comments

@stof
Copy link

stof commented Jun 11, 2019

See #1003 (comment) for the discussion about it.

@pyrmont pyrmont added the bugfix-request A request for a bugfix to be developed. label Jun 11, 2019
@pyrmont
Copy link
Contributor

pyrmont commented Jun 11, 2019

Thanks for filing the issue, @stof!

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 10, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for more than a year. It will be closed if no additional activity occurs within the next 14 days.
If you would like this issue to remain open, please reply and let us know if the issue is still reproducible.

@stale stale bot added the stale-issue There has been no activity for a year. label Jun 10, 2020
@stof
Copy link
Author

stof commented Jun 10, 2020

AFAICT, this is still valid.

Btw, modern Twig versions don't support {% raw %} anymore.

@stale stale bot removed the stale-issue There has been no activity for a year. label Jun 10, 2020
@pyrmont
Copy link
Contributor

pyrmont commented Jun 19, 2020

Thanks for confirming, @stof. I'll try to prioritise this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugfix-request A request for a bugfix to be developed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants