-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport: Switch lifecycle to use the RCLCPP macros #2234
Backport: Switch lifecycle to use the RCLCPP macros #2234
Conversation
@tonynajjar Can you add a Signed-off-by line to the comment please? |
fdbb852
to
766c69a
Compare
…<[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tony Najjar <[email protected]>
766c69a
to
3210658
Compare
CI fails to build rclcpp. I had the same error locally, I had to clone rcl and rebuild rclcpp from scratch. |
Yeah, we need to do a release of |
Regardless, that doesn't block this PR; we can build everything from source and get confidence that way. That said, I'm not going to do any of that until #2233 is merged into Rolling. |
Makes sense. I quickly checked that for Iron there are no conflicts, so it should be a smooth backport with mergify |
This pull request has been mentioned on ROS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.ros.org/t/new-packages-and-patch-release-for-humble-hawksbill-2023-07-24/32523/6 |
Backport of #2233. Tested on Humble, works as expected.