-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Port smach_viewer to rqt_smach #2
Comments
Moved from ros-visualization/rqt#15 |
catkinized #10 |
It seems that there is a multiple forks with rqt_smach (like here https://gist.github.com/matt3o/88bced95dba37a8932a51904d0734dff from @matt3o). It could be interesting to merge them to have an official version and release. |
Hi, we're currently writing detailed document on our efforts on Anyway please send us the PR for P.S. If you're willing to take over this job and back this package from orphaned status, that's great!. |
Hey guys, I am the author of the gist. If I can be of any help - tell me. My intention to split off an own fork was purely based on the decision that this repo didn't seem to accept any PRs any longer. If desired I can surely open a PR - however I only made a few base fixed to let this run on kinetic at all. I believe that xdot is deprecated as well - but my version is still using it. For my fixes to run correctly we also need to update jbohrens xdot or fork an own xdot repo which I did. Both sound undesirable to me. Any ideas on how we shall proceed? |
current smach_viewer contains xdot within it's package directory. I know this is not a clean solution, but could not find other one. May be this could be one possibility for you to create new PR for your rqt_samch, with out depending on xdot fork. |
Sorry for the late reply - I'm rather busy right now.
If that's what you intended answer the questions and give me your go so that I can start the necessary PRs. |
|
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: