You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This may be an issue with R, rather than the tsfeatures package, but when replicating a colleague's code I noticed that the results of some feature functions can differ between machines. From my initial testing, it seems that the difference is between Apple Silicon ARM chips (M1, M2, etc.) and x86, whether the latter is running Mac, Windows, or Linux.
For example, I set up the following code snippet to run on a GitHub action on Mac Arm, Mac x86, Linux x86, and Windows x86, and collected the results:
This may be an issue with R, rather than the tsfeatures package, but when replicating a colleague's code I noticed that the results of some feature functions can differ between machines. From my initial testing, it seems that the difference is between Apple Silicon ARM chips (M1, M2, etc.) and x86, whether the latter is running Mac, Windows, or Linux.
For example, I set up the following code snippet to run on a GitHub action on Mac Arm, Mac x86, Linux x86, and Windows x86, and collected the results:
The three x86 platforms return identical values, but several features from the stl_features function differ on Mac ARM. For example:
Both Mac platforms use LAPACK version 3.12.0 for matrix algebra, though I understand this itself can vary between architectures.
This test code was run with both R 4.4.0, and also R 4.4.2, with identical results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: