Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEATURE REQUEST: Smaller App Cards or Larger Collection Cards #230

Open
asimons04 opened this issue Jul 28, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

FEATURE REQUEST: Smaller App Cards or Larger Collection Cards #230

asimons04 opened this issue Jul 28, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@asimons04
Copy link

asimons04 commented Jul 28, 2022

I realize smaller cards have been requested before (#51), and the recommended solution was to use collections.

The problem is the collection cards are the same size as a regular card. You still have to scroll within the card which is uglier and more annoying than just having a bunch of massive, individual app cards.

Possible solutions:

  1. Make collection cards at least twice the height of regular cards.
  2. Make the icons and font smaller in collection cards
  3. A combination of both # 1 and # 2
  4. Add an option to config.ini to allow setting the size of cards. Can even be fixed sizes like [tiny, small, normal, large, extra_large] if that makes things easier.
  5. Allow custom CSS to be defined so admins can set them as desired in their deployments.

Currently, there's just too much wasted space and unnecessary scrolling.

I used dev tools in Chrome to set element.style min-height and max-height to 500px for a single collection card, just as a demo, and that's pretty much exactly what I expected to see when I set up my first collection instead of the cramped, scrolling regular-sized app card (see screenshot).

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant