Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks #31

Open
mit-73 opened this issue Apr 6, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks #31

mit-73 opened this issue Apr 6, 2021 · 7 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mit-73
Copy link

mit-73 commented Apr 6, 2021

Maybe add your framework to FrameworkBenchmarks so you can compare its performance?

@rknell rknell added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 7, 2021
@rknell
Copy link
Owner

rknell commented Apr 7, 2021

Now that 0.1.0 is released I am going to focus on some of these things

@nicolasvac
Copy link

Any news on this?

@rknell
Copy link
Owner

rknell commented Jul 4, 2021

Not yet- I'm wrapping up two other big projects and will have some time to dedicate to some of the other things like this that require me to dig in shortly.

What I can say is so far it handles an insane amount of connections really well. Alfred itself is very lightweight and adds virtually zero overhead - its just what you do with dart.

@thosakwe
Copy link

thosakwe commented Jul 7, 2021

I'm willing to help out with this - I've sent a few pull requests to TechEmpower before, so hopefully I could be of help here.

@NathanDraco22
Copy link
Contributor

This Framework is amazing!! really amazing!!!

@rknell
Copy link
Owner

rknell commented Jul 11, 2021

@thosakwe thanks mate, I'll give it a go shortly so at least I know the workflow. Is there anything I need to look out for?

@tomassasovsky
Copy link

Some tests we made for a project we're working on:
tomassasovsky/WeAppe.ar#16 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants