You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 13, 2021. It is now read-only.
possibly a similar motivation as #9, what do you think about native construction of the R6 objects?
i currently have the issue that the construction of R6 objects is too slow, and while i could add this capability to R6, i think w wants to keep the dependencies as light as possible (i.e. not include Rcpp)
so i could add them to RcppR6.
pros:
faster
doesn't actually require the user to have R6 installed (!)
cons:
possible breakage when R6 changes (although it's pretty mature and doesn't change much).
thoughts?
jonathon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
hi,
possibly a similar motivation as #9, what do you think about native construction of the
R6
objects?i currently have the issue that the construction of
R6
objects is too slow, and while i could add this capability toR6
, i think w wants to keep the dependencies as light as possible (i.e. not includeRcpp
)so i could add them to
RcppR6
.pros:
R6
installed (!)cons:
R6
changes (although it's pretty mature and doesn't change much).thoughts?
jonathon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: