status?

[veeramarni]

I like the concept but looks like this project is not been updated for while. Is there any issue with the concept of packaging the bootstrap code?

[hourliert]

Hi,

Thanks for your interest. I am very busy right now and don't have the time to maintain retax.
I will try to do so in a few weeks (during my next vacation).

If you want to help or have specific question, feel free to ask. I still have enough time to answer github issues.

Thanks!

[veeramarni]

@hourliert

Thanks for your reply. I would like to help this project, and we are trying to see if we can make this working on our end.

We also want to understand whether it is good to keep the store as a class or should be a pure function. From this forum which gives powerful insight into the redux store and why to use pure functions. Whereas here I see the store state is stored in the class, would that require serializing/deserializing to modify the state? Or is there a way to make it pure functional using inversify's toDynamicValue.

Also, we would want code splitting by default and inject reducer lazily (similar to next). This way we can reduce downloading some code upfront when not needed. Which means the store need to be replaced with new reducers and make sure we are not unloading the loaded reducers. I think this is something we can achievable which we want to experiment it and will give you feedback on it.