Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

How about using pairwise covariance to deal with missing values? #2

Open
psychelzh opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

How about using pairwise covariance to deal with missing values? #2

psychelzh opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@psychelzh
Copy link

It is prone to have bad trials in EEG data, and it will be nice if the CorrCA could be possible in such circumstances. For now, I believe the straightest solution is calculate pairwise covariance. I am wondering if it is okay to do so? Is there any bias introduced by this method?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@psychelzh