-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature]: Migrate from xdm to mdx-js v2 #1802
Comments
As far as I know, MDX2 got a lot of learnings & code from xdm. That should mean, the migration effort is not too high. |
xdm now explicitly recommends using mdx 2 as well. |
Happy to take a PR to address this. Going to close the issue as it's not a top priority in the meantime. |
Hey, I have opened a PR for this here: #4054. As a bonus, removing |
🤖 Hello there, We just published version Thanks! |
What is the new or updated feature that you are suggesting?
A few days ago MDX 2 got released!
I propose to migrate from
xdm
tomdx-js
v2.Why should this feature be included?
As far as I understand all features from
xdm
are now part ofmdx-js
v2.Also, it seems like
xdm
could not be supported sometime in the future.(see: wooorm/xdm/issues/94 and kentcdodds/mdx-bundler/issues/137)
For me, it would make sense to migrate to the official
mdx-js
for these reasons.Is this something you would want as well?
Or is someone already working on this? Would you be interested in a PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: