Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to get read-models and sagas list using module-admin #1807

Closed
alexslavr opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1812
Closed

Unable to get read-models and sagas list using module-admin #1807

alexslavr opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1812
Assignees
Labels
bug Issues related to defects and incorrect/unexpected feature behavior severity: moderate Issues with medium impact on the product, e.g., new features, non-critical defects, etc.

Comments

@alexslavr
Copy link

alexslavr commented Apr 12, 2021

Screenshots
Screenshot 2021-04-12 at 16 07 04

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • Node.js Version 10.22
  • ReSolve Version 0.29.0

Additional context
We are using a custom read-model in our app (elastic search)

@alexslavr
Copy link
Author

"api/read-models-list" API-handler works fine
Screenshot 2021-04-12 at 16 40 27

"api/sagas-list" returns error:
TypeError: req.resolve.domainInterop.sagaDomain.getSchedulersNamesBySagas(...) is not a function or its return value is not iterable

@MrCheater MrCheater self-assigned this Apr 13, 2021
@MrCheater MrCheater added bug Issues related to defects and incorrect/unexpected feature behavior severity: moderate Issues with medium impact on the product, e.g., new features, non-critical defects, etc. labels Apr 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Issues related to defects and incorrect/unexpected feature behavior severity: moderate Issues with medium impact on the product, e.g., new features, non-critical defects, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants