Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add new CVar sv_maxusrcmdprocessticks_holdaim #840

Open
SergeyShorokhov opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Add new CVar sv_maxusrcmdprocessticks_holdaim #840

SergeyShorokhov opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
Engine: 📀 reHLDS Case refers to reHLDS engine. Priority: ⚠️ medium Medium priority tasks that should be addressed soon. Status: 🕐 pending Issue is penging list. Type: 🚀 enhancement Improvement or addition of a new feature.

Comments

@SergeyShorokhov
Copy link
Member

SergeyShorokhov commented Jun 21, 2021 •
edited
Loading

CVar Def. value Description
sv_maxusrcmdprocessticks_holdaim 0 Hold client aim for multiple server sim ticks when client-issued usrcmd contains multiple actions (0: off; 1: hold this server tick; 2+: hold multiple ticks)

Port it from CS:GO leaked source code

Thanks to danil.nesvetaev for the reminder of this functionality in CS:GO. 👍

Related comment: #837 (comment)
@SergeyShorokhov SergeyShorokhov added Engine: 📀 reHLDS Case refers to reHLDS engine. Type: 🚀 enhancement Improvement or addition of a new feature. Priority: ⚠️ medium Medium priority tasks that should be addressed soon. labels Jun 21, 2021
@dystopm
Copy link
Contributor

dystopm commented Jun 22, 2021

Hi. Can you show a brief example of what behaviour will this modification improve? Thanks!

@SergeyShorokhov
Copy link
Member Author

@PM32 This CVar is present in CS:GO and it affects the function pSilent in the cheats.

I'll just give you an example of how pSilent works at the moment, as well as a link to the discussion on the cheat forum.

@dystopm
Copy link
Contributor

dystopm commented Jun 22, 2021

@wopox1337 thansk for answering. Have you tested this already, proving it's effectiveness?

@SergeyShorokhov SergeyShorokhov added the Status: 🕐 pending Issue is penging list. label Jun 23, 2021
@SergeyShorokhov
Copy link
Member Author

@PM32 At this point in the "proceedings".

@WaLkZa
Copy link
Contributor

WaLkZa commented Apr 28, 2023

Any updates?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Engine: 📀 reHLDS Case refers to reHLDS engine. Priority: ⚠️ medium Medium priority tasks that should be addressed soon. Status: 🕐 pending Issue is penging list. Type: 🚀 enhancement Improvement or addition of a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@dystopm @WaLkZa @SergeyShorokhov and others