Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Addressing feedback for instance sizes #1552

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 17, 2022
Merged

Addressing feedback for instance sizes #1552

merged 4 commits into from
May 17, 2022

Conversation

wtrocki
Copy link
Collaborator

@wtrocki wtrocki commented May 4, 2022

Refactor sizes to introduce better handling:

  • Dot not sent plan for trial kafka. There is no concept of plan for those
  • Fix bypas_ams_check flag breaking creation
  • Rename flag to better reflect what it does.

wtrocki added 2 commits May 4, 2022 12:48
BREAKING: This change is introduced to reflect what this flag does. We have been adding numerous checks that some developers and CI environments want to skip.
@wtrocki wtrocki requested a review from rkpattnaik780 May 4, 2022 11:50
With developer instances/standard instances of single size we can skip ask for the size completely.
@wtrocki wtrocki changed the title Trial size Addressing feedback for instance sizes May 4, 2022
@wtrocki
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wtrocki commented May 4, 2022

Found bug when testing this. For standard instance we actually need to enforce size being specified :(

@wtrocki wtrocki requested a review from pb82 May 4, 2022 14:56
@wtrocki
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wtrocki commented May 4, 2022

Because of compatibility layer we can avoid specifying size for standard instance. @pb82 do you plan to remove that capability at some point. It is important for us to not break existing clients that create kafka with just specifying name.

I can code some layer that picks first size from the list and use it, but It would be better to keep that logic on backend instead.

@pb82
Copy link

pb82 commented May 13, 2022

@wtrocki there are no plans to remove the ability to skip the plan field at that time.

@wtrocki wtrocki closed this May 17, 2022
@wtrocki wtrocki reopened this May 17, 2022
@wtrocki wtrocki merged commit d044ae3 into main May 17, 2022
@wtrocki wtrocki deleted the trial-size branch May 17, 2022 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants