Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update terms spec url #1291

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 5, 2021
Merged

fix: update terms spec url #1291

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 5, 2021

Conversation

wtrocki
Copy link
Collaborator

@wtrocki wtrocki commented Nov 5, 2021

Use production based json file.
use termsandconditions file for verification

@wtrocki wtrocki requested a review from craicoverflow November 5, 2021 12:01
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ SHELL = bash
RHOAS_VERSION ?= "dev"
REPOSITORY_OWNER ?= "redhat-developer"
REPOSITORY_NAME ?= "app-services-cli"
TERMS_SPEC_URL ?= "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redhat-developer/app-services-ui/main/static/configs/terms-conditions-spec.json"
TERMS_SPEC_URL ?= "https://console.redhat.com/apps/application-services/terms-conditions-spec.json"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We will probably want a different one for stage and prod?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why we would need it?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Spec file could be different between stage and prod versions

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wtrocki wtrocki Nov 5, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do not have ability to detect env and we need more sophisticated remote config for massso. I think this requirement would need more design etc.

If we need config agains stage I think we should build different version of cli for now

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this tc config should be refactored to more generic config. Created issue to cover this work but this is out of scope of current PR

@wtrocki wtrocki merged commit d3fbadd into main Nov 5, 2021
@wtrocki wtrocki deleted the update-terms branch November 5, 2021 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants