valid_doc false negative

[agordeev]

The function below returns warning: Valid Docs Violation: Documented declarations should be valid. (valid_docs)

/**
 Sets alpha to all subviews of a specific `UIView`, except of given subview.

 - parameter alpha: New alpha value for subviews
 - parameter view: UIView the action should be applied to
 - parameter exceptView: The view, that should not change it's alpha
 - parameter duration: Duration of the animation in seconds
 */
class func setAlpha(alpha alpha: CGFloat, view: UIView, exceptSubview: UIView, duration: NSTimeInterval) {
}

Is there any way to check what exactly causes this warning?

[Yaro812]

check parameter name for exceptView (it is exceptSubview in your method)
you might want to use VVDocumenter-Xcode plugin that handles documentation templates automatically

[agordeev]

@Yaro812 Thanks a lot, my bad!

However, this one shows the warning as well:

/**
 Returns messages for given conversation.

 - parameter conversation: A conversation.
 - parameter limit: Defines max count of returned messages.
 - parameter success: Success closure.
 - parameter failure: Failure closure.
*/
func obtainPreviousMessagesForConversation(conversation: Conversation, limit: Int, success: SuccessWithEntitiesCompletionHandler, failure: FailureCompletionHandler) {
}

[freak4pc]

Just tested it and not getting a documentation error on it.

14:26:39 freak4pc » swiftlint                                                                                                                                      

Linting Swift files in current working directory
Linting 't.swift' (1/1)
/Users/freak4pc/Work/Tests/lint/t.swift:9: warning: Line Length Violation: Line should be 100 characters or less: currently 166 characters (line_length)
Done linting! Found 1 violation, 0 serious in 1 file.

[Yaro812]

You are using the completion handler. There might be a slight bug in Swiftlint that shows documentation warning when closure that returns no value is written like (param: Int) -> (). You can rewrite it to be (param: Int) -> Void

[agordeev]

@freak4pc Interesting. Can you please try this one:

/**
 Returns messages for given conversation.

 - parameter conversation: A conversation.
 - parameter limit: Defines max count of returned messages.
 - parameter success: Success closure.
 - parameter failure: Failure closure.
*/
func obtainPreviousMessagesForConversation(conversation: String, limit: Int, success: (() -> Void)?, failure: (() -> Void)?) {
}

I'm getting a warning with this.

By the way, my completion handlers look like this:

typealias SuccessWithEntitiesCompletionHandler = ((entities: [T]) -> Void)?
typealias FailureCompletionHandler = ((allowRetry: Bool, errorMessage: String) -> Void)?

If the above piece compiles fine for you, may be I should update my SwiftLint? The current version is 0.10.0.

[freak4pc]

I'm a bit busy atm will check later but you should definitely update. Current is 0.11.1 afaik.

[agordeev]

@freak4pc Thanks. brew says swiftlint 0.10.0 already installed.

[freak4pc]

@andrew8712 Did you try brew update && brew upgrade swiftlint ?

[agordeev]

@freak4pc No, sorry. Updated fine now, however, getting the same warning with swiftlint 0.11.1

[agordeev]

@freak4pc I found the problem. My func's description starts with Returns word, which caused ValidDocsRule.commentReturns(_:) function returns true. However, the func doesn't return any value, that's why SwiftLint is showing a warning: superfluousReturnDocumentation returns true.

Since my func has completion handlers, I believe the documentation may contain "Returns" keyword. So this condition is not the best fit:

    return comment.lowercaseString.containsString("- returns:") ||
    comment.rangeOfString("Returns")?.startIndex == comment.startIndex

Any ideas how to handle a case with completion handlers?

[jpsim]

If you want to bypass SwiftLint's semantics for determining whether or not a function returns, disable the rule.

[freak4pc]

You description starts with a - returns: ? as an entire phrase ? that seems odd.
Could you share more details on how that looks in your code?

Edit: Oh sorry, just noticed that second part of the condition. @jpsim Is there any reason why this couldn't be omitted? If a method returns and doesn't include a - returns: it should result in a valid_docs rule warning. I'm not sure a description starting with Returns fits as a rule ?

[jpsim]

A description starting with Returns is treated the same was as if - returns: had been included.

I don't think blocks/closures that are invoked with parameters count as "returning" in the same sense, and therefore shouldn't use either approach.

[marcelofabri]

Closing this since we removed this rule.

[freak4pc]

@marcelofabri Mind linking to discussion on that?
Was the valid docs rule removed altogether ?

[marcelofabri]

This rule wasn't working at all since Swift 2.3. At some point we disabled it on Swift 2.3+ and on the next release we'll drop support for Swift 2, so the rule was removed.

[freak4pc]

Gotya. Thanks for the clarification 👍
Should we investigate rewriting that rule or the consensus is there's no use for it ATM ?

[marcelofabri]

The issue was that SourceKit stopped providing the information we need to make it work. Check #728 for more info.