Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEA] upgrade cuml to c++14 #304

Closed
teju85 opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

[FEA] upgrade cuml to c++14 #304

teju85 opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@teju85
Copy link
Member

teju85 commented Mar 12, 2019

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
cudf is already at C++14. Except for the exec_policy code simplification as described in PR #247 , I don't see much of C++14-specific use-case in cuML, for now. Also, I don't see any reason not to upgrade to 14. Thus, for an overall uniform RAPIDS environment, it does make sense to upgrade cuML to C++14.

Describe the solution you'd like
We need to upgrade our code to C++14 for cuML. However, IMO, this can be a lower priority task, aimed for branch-0.7 timeframe.

Describe alternatives you've considered
None.

Additional context
-NA-

@teju85 teju85 added ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify feature request New feature or request labels Mar 12, 2019
@dantegd dantegd added 0 - Backlog In queue waiting for assignment and removed ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify feature request New feature or request labels Mar 12, 2019
@robocopnixon robocopnixon removed the 0 - Backlog In queue waiting for assignment label Apr 23, 2019
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented May 1, 2019

@teju85, Given the amount of work we have on our plates for 0.7, can we push this to 0.8?

@teju85
Copy link
Member Author

teju85 commented May 2, 2019

With the amount of work we have, I'd even go further to claim that we should probably revisit this item in 0.9!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants