Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] Re-enable failing disabled RemoteGraph cugraph-service tests #2914

Closed
Tracked by #3412
rlratzel opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #3412

[BUG] Re-enable failing disabled RemoteGraph cugraph-service tests #2914

rlratzel opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@rlratzel

Comments

@rlratzel
Copy link
Contributor

PR 2862 disabled some test that fail intermittently, which seemed to be unrelated to the changes in the PR. In order to get those changes merged, the tests were disabled with the intention of opening a followup PR to re-enable them and get CI passing with them enabled. This issue is for creating that followup PR.
@rlratzel rlratzel added this to the 22.12 milestone Nov 10, 2022
@rlratzel rlratzel assigned rlratzel and unassigned eriknw Nov 10, 2022
@rlratzel rlratzel added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 10, 2022
@rlratzel rlratzel changed the title Re-enable disabled RemoteGraph cugraph-service tests [BUG] Re-enable failing disabled RemoteGraph cugraph-service tests Nov 10, 2022
@BradReesWork BradReesWork modified the milestones: 22.12, 23.02 Dec 7, 2022
@rlratzel rlratzel removed this from the 23.02 milestone Jan 23, 2023
@rlratzel rlratzel mentioned this issue Apr 4, 2023
Closed
@rlratzel rlratzel removed the bug Something isn't working label Apr 10, 2023
@rlratzel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Removed the "bug" label since it is covered as a task in #3412 and being treated as tech debt.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rlratzel rlratzel

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@eriknw @rlratzel @kingmesal @BradReesWork