-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEA] local bridges (similar to Nx) #1418
Comments
@geoHeil thanks for the suggestion, we will investigate level of effort and work this request into the backlog |
FYI: networkx works well when computing the local bridges without the shortest paths (with_span=False) https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66291151/how-to-consume-a-python-gneerator-in-parallel-using-multiprocessing/66302419#66302419 When trying to replace networkx with cugraph in a naive way i.e. only substituting the shortest path computation it still is really slow - as the whole loop is still running in python on a single core. |
dropping the compatibility portion of this issues since that is captured in another issues and ties into the on-going work with NetworkX. The request for local bridges is still valid |
local_bridges can be constructed using the technique from edge triangle counting, which is being added in 24.06. Instead of counting, we can remove any vertex pairs that are part of a triangle. After #4382 is merged into the 24.06 release we should be able to schedule this work when we have someone to implement it. |
Improve Networkx API compatibility: add support for local bridges:
https://networkx.org/documentation/stable//reference/algorithms/generated/networkx.algorithms.bridges.local_bridges.html#networkx.algorithms.bridges.local_bridges
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: