We would love you to contribute to this project. You can do so in various ways.
Help others by participating in our forum.
Before you ask a question, search the forum. The answer may have already been provided.
File bugs you found in the code or features you would like to see in the future in our issue tracker.
- Register yourself on our issue tracker
- Search the list of open issues first, your bug or feature may have already been reported
- When filing a bug
- Be concise
- Qualify steps to reproduce a problem
- Specify environment you found the bug in (library version etc.)
- If possible, attach a test case that reproduces the problem
You can contribute code that fixes bugs and/or implements features.
- Start with an EasyPick: In our Jira we label issues which we consider small and easy to start on as EasyPicks.
- Have a look on what we are working on first to check that we do not perform duplicated work
- Read through our contribution guide lines
- Implement the feature or bug fix on a feature branch and submit the result as a pull request
- tabs as spaces / tab size 2 (all files)
- If you created a number of commits, squash your work into a few commits only.
- Create commit messages that adhere to our commit message style(see below).
This page defines a convention for commit messages for camundaBPM related projects.
All commits pushed to the camunda BPM repositories must conform to that convention.
The contents of this page are partly based on the angular commit messages document.
The commit message is what is what describes your contribution. Its purpose must therefore be to document what a commit contributes to a project.
Its head line should be as meaningful as possible because it is always seen along with other commit messages.
Its body should provide information to comprehend the commit for people who care.
Its footer may contain references to external artifacts (issues it solves, related commits) as well as breaking change notes.
This applies to all kind of projects.
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<BLANK LINE>
<body>
<BLANK LINE>
<footer>
First line cannot be longer than 70 characters, second line is always blank and other lines should be wrapped at 80 characters! This makes the message easier to read on github as well as in various git tools.
The subject line contains succinct description of the change.
- feat (feature)
- fix (bug fix)
- docs (documentation)
- style (formatting, missing semi colons, …)
- refactor
- test (when adding missing tests)
- chore (maintain)
- improve (improvement, e.g. enhanced feature)
Scope could be anything specifying place of the commit change. For example in the camunda-modeler project this could be import, export, property panel, label, id, ...
- use imperative, present tense: change not changed nor changes or changing
- do not capitalize first letter
- do not append dot (.) at the end
- just as in use imperative, present tense: change not changed nor changes or changing
- include motivation for the change and contrast it with previous behavior
All breaking changes have to be mentioned in footer with the description of the change, justification and migration notes
BREAKING CHANGE: Id editing feature temporarily removed
As a work around, change the id in XML using replace all or friends
Closed bugs / feature requests / issues should be listed on a separate line in the footer prefixed with "Closes" keyword like this:
Closes #234
or in case of multiple issues:
Closes #123, #245, #992
- http://365git.tumblr.com/post/3308646748/writing-git-commit-messages
- http://tbaggery.com/2008/04/19/a-note-about-git-commit-messages.html
I.e. why to use add test for #foo versus added test for #foo or adding test for foo?
Makes commit logs way more readable. See the work you did during a commit as a work on an issue and the commit as solving that issue. Now write about for what issue the commit is a result rather than what you did or are currently doing.
Example: You write a test for the function #foo. You commit the test. You use the commit message add test for #foo. Why? Because that is what the commit solves.
Use chore(merge): <what>
.
Ask yourself, why it is only a micro change. Use feat = docs, style or chore depending on the change of your merge. Please see next question if you consider commiting work in progress.
Do not do it or do it (except for locally) or do it on a non public branch (ie. non master / develop ...) if you need to share the stuff you do.
When you finished your work, squash the changes to commits with reasonable commit messages and push them on a public branch.