Replies: 4 comments
-
I will convert this issue to a GitHub discussion. Currently GitHub will automatically close and lock the issue even though your question will be transferred and responded to elsewhere. This is to let you know that we do not intend to ignore this but this is how the current GitHub conversion mechanism makes it seem for the users :( |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It will be requeued since the timeout simply causes the channel to be closed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
An potentially important addition to the above: only deliveries for consumers that use manual acknowledgements will be requeued. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That's great @michaelklishin. Thanks a million for a prompt response. Happy to open a PR to clarify that in the docs if it would be helpful. Edit: Looks like the change has already been committed! 🚀 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
From reading this documentation I can see that there is a timeout mechanism for unacked messages. What isn't clear to me from reading it is whether or not those messages will be requeued or is the expectation that the application will configure a dead letter queue to handle this?
My workflow is:
Will this message be requeued?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions