You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 18, 2023. It is now read-only.
In fact, I think System.out is a better choice for this test suite, because:
We don't have any use for any feature of any logging system.
We don't want to confuse logging output of test applications with logging output of tests.
We can add colors :-)
I strongly disagree:
With a proper logging, It's much easier to troubleshot issues which is very necessary for a test suite (we can turn on/off the traces we want to see, for example).
Sorry, I don't fully understand this statement. But we can redirect any traces to be written in the Console plus one file, or directly to another file. It would be only a matter of configuration.
We sure need proper logging for test applications. For the test framework and tests themselves -- I doubt it. That's why I went with plain old stdout. But if you can demonstrate where proper logging would be useful, then sure, let's use it.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
At the moment, this information is logged only in the OpenShiftTests, see line:
We should refactor this to have only one JUnit extension that needs to be run for both OpenShiftTests and QuarkusTest.
Moreover, we should use the logger instead System.out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: