-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove data set filter? #60
Comments
Great idea about using the validator! Then maybe the filter message can point people to the new artifact viz too? I am imagining a little graph icon that goes there with a tool tip "explore artifact" or similar? galaxyproject/galaxy#18799 |
I may be missing something, but I believe the reason is that it is possible to browse/select a dataset manually, in which case the option filter doesn't get used. So the Validator exists as a backstop for anyone who provides the input in the strange (non-dropdown) way. I would be interested to know if there's a way to add a more interesting message to the option filter, but I suspect it doesn't really apply, since as you mention mostly you never see a wrong dataset (unless you try very hard through the browse UI). |
You are right and I did not know about this yet :) I tried to start a discussion galaxyproject/galaxy#19275 I think for the moment it might be the best to check if Let me just mention that the filters might render to toolform imperformant for large histories. But this is probably not a real concern here. |
Seems that people still have problems to get the correct input for the tools: https://help.galaxyproject.org/t/re-qiime2-diversity-alpha/13332
At the moment data inputs have an option filter and a validator: https://github.com/qiime2/galaxy-tools/blob/0888694a8a6241befae7f9eed8a56bc13d4593a0/tools/suite_qiime2__diversity/qiime2__diversity__alpha.xml#L28
Hence, at the moment the validator is never active .. because the user can not select a wrong dataset.
Intuitively (IMO) it might be better to remove the filter and improve the message of the filter, i.e. make it more specific.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: