Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A macOS app icon that meets Apple's standards #161

Open
Jerry23011 opened this issue Jan 21, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

A macOS app icon that meets Apple's standards #161

Jerry23011 opened this issue Jan 21, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@Jerry23011
Copy link

Jerry23011 commented Jan 21, 2023

Feature description

Hi, I noticed that the QGIS app icon doesn't yet meet Apple's human interface standards for app icons, so QGIS looks a little abrupt on macOS. I think a modified version would look nicer.
Thanks for the great platform :)

Additional context

The screenshot below shows how QGIS looks compared to other macOS apps.

213446752-94aa008f-0d17-4187-b629-05dfcb229314

The icon from macOSicons could serve as a good exemplar.

@deebz
Copy link

deebz commented Dec 14, 2023

Hello,

I noticed this too and thought I'd contribute. Attached is a zip archive of PNG's. I redrew the qgis logo so I was working with vectors and used the apple guidelines template files to correctly size the icons.

With Gratitude

qgis-icon-pack.zip

@deebz
Copy link

deebz commented Dec 14, 2023

Following on from above I've created two variants – light and dark – of the app icon background.

qgis-app-icons.zip

Screenshot 2023-12-14 at 17 05 24

@shreyass-ranganatha
Copy link

Hi, is this issue at a standstill, or is it accepting PRs ?

@3nids
Copy link
Member

3nids commented Oct 10, 2024

you can suggest a change in QGIS source code: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/tree/master/images/icons/mac

@luispuerto
Copy link

This would be nice… didn't we advance here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants