From 38db46979ac1fc4010286007ece7414ce5303920 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Troxler <steven.troxler@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:02:35 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] PEP 677: Use PEP 646 syntax when discussing unpack

I'd intended to fix this based on feedback in an earlier PR, but missed
it.
---
 pep-0677.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pep-0677.rst b/pep-0677.rst
index b61fe32010a..b03fc20e084 100644
--- a/pep-0677.rst
+++ b/pep-0677.rst
@@ -468,8 +468,8 @@ evaluate the AST form::
         Name("bool")
     )
 
-and be treated by type checkers as equivalent to
-``Callable[[int, Unpack[Ts]], bool]``.
+and be treated by type checkers as equivalent to or ``Callable[[int,
+*Ts], bool]`` or ``Callable[[int, Unpack[Ts]], bool]``.
 
 
 Implications of the Grammar