Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make .git_archival.txt more reproducible #1033

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

LecrisUT
Copy link
Contributor

I believe the harm of ref-names outweigh the benefits of it, especially since this is mostly dependent on the git host provider that would produce the git archive.

Closes #806

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, its unfortunate as this also looses the branch name (which is sometimes needed)
but the branch name was only ever included in the branch head to begin with

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The documented .git_archival.txt causes git archives to change hash after first post-release commit is made
2 participants