Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

twine-upload: add a nudge for trusted publishing #167

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions twine-upload.sh
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ INPUT_VERIFY_METADATA="$(get-normalized-input 'verify-metadata')"
INPUT_SKIP_EXISTING="$(get-normalized-input 'skip-existing')"
INPUT_PRINT_HASH="$(get-normalized-input 'print-hash')"

TRUSTED_PUBLISHING_NUDGE="::warning title=Upgrade to Trusted Publishing::\
Trusted Publishers allows publishing packages to PyPI from automated \
environments like GitHub Actions without needing to use username/password \
combinations or API tokens to authenticate with PyPI. Read more: \
https://docs.pypi.org/trusted-publishers"

if [[ "${INPUT_USER}" == "__token__" && -z "${INPUT_PASSWORD}" ]] ; then
# No password supplied by the user implies that we're in the OIDC flow;
# retrieve the OIDC credential and exchange it for a PyPI API token.
Expand All @@ -53,10 +59,18 @@ elif [[ "${INPUT_USER}" == '__token__' ]]; then
echo \
'::notice::Using a user-provided API token for authentication' \
"against ${INPUT_REPOSITORY_URL}"

if [[ "${INPUT_REPOSITORY_URL}" =~ pypi\.org ]]; then
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NB: This should match both test.pypi.org and pypi.org.

Technically other indices can also support trusted publishing, and the maximally correct way to handle these would be a network round-trip to the audience endpoint that we defined for this purpose.

That seemed like a relatively heavy check to add for a pretty small case, so I've left it out. But if you all prefer we have it, then I think I should probably rewrite this nudge in Python a la the oidc-exchange.py helper 🙂

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm happy with this initial approach.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@di @webknjaz I'm not an actual reviewer for this project, are you both okay with this approach to filtering indices?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I think this if fine for now. We do an audience lookup inside the OIDC flow, so moving it out could be helpful. But let's postpone that for now since it requires rewriting sh script that would be out of the scope here.

echo "${TRUSTED_PUBLISHING_NUDGE}"
fi
else
echo \
'::notice::Using a username + password pair for authentication' \
"against ${INPUT_REPOSITORY_URL}"

if [[ "${INPUT_REPOSITORY_URL}" =~ pypi\.org ]]; then
echo "${TRUSTED_PUBLISHING_NUDGE}"
fi
fi

if [[
Expand Down