You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current idea is not possible. Because we need fixed latent dimensionality for for inference approaches MCMC and VI. Flexibility can be introduced when doing AEVB only.
I thought about more flexible shape handling a bit, as it came up a couple of times now. I've got a few ideas, and a sketch of an implementation for some of it. I'll push it later, maybe we can mention it in the meeting tomorrow.
For example, the model
will fail with exception:
This situation arises for me when working with
GP
classes. Would it be a good idea to handle a symbolic shape argument given to a distribution?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: