Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to PyMC3 3.6 #36

Closed
twiecki opened this issue May 16, 2019 · 9 comments
Closed

Upgrade to PyMC3 3.6 #36

twiecki opened this issue May 16, 2019 · 9 comments

Comments

@twiecki
Copy link
Member

twiecki commented May 16, 2019

These should all be ported to work with recent pymc3 and arviz.

@AlexAndorra
Copy link
Contributor

I can help with that, since I'll also work on porting the exercices and/or homeworks.
From I understood though, there is a 3.7 version coming soon? If so, shouldn't we wait for it?

@twiecki
Copy link
Member Author

twiecki commented May 16, 2019

Yes there is, and there are actually some changes (mainly renaming varnames and vars to var_names). You can for now just use master which will look 99% like 3.7.

@aloctavodia
Copy link
Member

"Rethinking" has been updated, but BDA3 and BCM are still outdated, right?

@junpenglao
Copy link
Member

I will do an update on BCM from pymc3 master.

@AlexAndorra
Copy link
Contributor

Where are we on this? Can we close? Asking because it looks like most NBs were updated.

@aloctavodia
Copy link
Member

BCM needs to be updated. I will do it

@aloctavodia
Copy link
Member

I offered myself to update BCM, but I never find the time, sorry :-( Does anyone else have the time to update it?

@AlexAndorra
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe I could do it, but I didn't read that book -- is that a problem? The idea is just to update the syntax to new versions of PyMC and ArviZ?

@aloctavodia
Copy link
Member

Yes, that's the idea. Thanks for your help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants