Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add python_requires #380

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

add python_requires #380

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

PyVCEchecker
Copy link

setting the keyword argument python_requires is a better way to declare Python compatibility #379

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 0.0% when pulling bd38115 on PyVCEchecker:master into be126ee on PyCQA:master.

atodorov
atodorov approved these changes Oct 31, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@atodorov atodorov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

I'm not sure if we need to remove some of the trove classifiers or not though.

@carlio carlio force-pushed the master branch 4 times, most recently from 610b489 to 932cc0e Compare May 15, 2023 03:50
@carlio
Copy link
Collaborator

carlio commented May 15, 2023

I'll close this as it is superseded, as I moved to poetry for packaging (partly due to pylint-dev/pylint-celery#14)

@carlio carlio closed this May 15, 2023
@carlio carlio mentioned this pull request May 15, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@atodorov atodorov atodorov approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@PyVCEchecker @coveralls @carlio @atodorov @LimerenceGL