Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sphinx eigenvalue parser problem fix (again) #1208

Open
ahmedabdelkawy opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

sphinx eigenvalue parser problem fix (again) #1208

ahmedabdelkawy opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ahmedabdelkawy
Copy link
Contributor

In addition to the explanation in #1159 (PR was closed as the branch was damaged), the problem in

def _parse_band(self, term):
       arr = np.loadtxt(re.findall(term, self.log_main, re.MULTILINE))
       shape = (-1, len(self.k_points), arr.shape[-1])
       if self.spin_enabled:
           shape = (-1, 2, len(self.k_points), shape[-1])
       return arr.reshape(shape)

apparently became more severe while doing minimization. This function tried to parse all eigenvalues at the end of each ionic steps (something still not implemented in the vasp parser as far as I know). This then can not be fixed with the fix I introduced in #1159 (arr = np.vstack((arr[::2], arr[1::2]))).

The reason again is that the eigen values in the Sphinx log has the following order:

1. Ionic step = 1
    1.1 KPOINTS = 1
        1.1.1 SPIN channel = 0
        1.1.2 SPIN channel = 1
    1.2 KPOINTS = 2
        1.2.1 SPIN channel = 0
        1.2.2 SPIN channel = 1
    1.3 KPOINTS = 3
        1.1.1 SPIN channel = 0
        1.1.2 SPIN channel = 1
    1.4 KPOINTS = 4
        1.2.1 SPIN channel = 0
        1.2.2 SPIN channel = 1
2. Ionic step = 2
    2.1 KPOINTS = 1
        2.1 SPIN channel = 0
        2.1.2 SPIN channel = 1
    2.2 KPOINTS = 2
        2.2.1 SPIN channel = 0
        2.2.2 SPIN channel = 1
    2.3 KPOINTS = 3
        2.1.1 SPIN channel = 0
        2.1.2 SPIN channel = 1
    2.4 KPOINTS = 4
        2.2.1 SPIN channel = 0
        2.2.2 SPIN channel = 1

with the shape = (n_ionic_steps, n_kpoints, n_spin_channnels, n_bands)

while the parser expects the following order:

1. Ionic step = 1
    1.1 SPIN channel = 0
        1.1.1 KPOINTS = 1
        1.1.2 KPOINTS = 2
        1.1.3 KPOINTS = 3
        1.1.4 KPOINTS = 4
    1.2 SPIN channel = 1
        1.2.1 KPOINTS = 1
        1.2.2 KPOINTS = 2
        1.2.3 KPOINTS = 3
        1.2.4 KPOINTS = 4
2. Ionic step = 2
    2.1 SPIN channel = 0
        2.1.1 KPOINTS = 1
        2.1.2 KPOINTS = 2
        2.1.3 KPOINTS = 3
        2.1.4 KPOINTS = 4
    2.2 SPIN channel = 1
        2.2.1 KPOINTS = 1
        2.2.2 KPOINTS = 2
        2.2.3 KPOINTS = 3
        2.2.4 KPOINTS = 4

with the shape = (n_ionic_steps, n_spin_channnels, n_kpoints, n_bands)

@ahmedabdelkawy ahmedabdelkawy added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 14, 2023
@ahmedabdelkawy
Copy link
Contributor Author

To reproduce (and notice) the problem, the system must contain two different spin channels and minimization calculation should be run. Here is an example where the reference DOS is VASP:

structure_fe = pr_ferro.create.structure.bulk('Fe', 'bcc', orthorhombic=True)
structure_fe.positions[0,0] += 0.1
structure_fe.set_initial_magnetic_moments([3,3])
sphinx_job = pr_ferro.create.job.Sphinx(job_name='Fe_min_spx', delete_existing_job=True)
sphinx_job.structure = structure_fe.copy()
sphinx_job.set_encut(450)
sphinx_job.set_kpoints([13,13,13])
sphinx_job.set_occupancy_smearing(smearing='FermiDirac', width= 0.05, order=0)
sphinx_job.set_empty_states(7)
sphinx_job.server.cores = 5
sphinx_job.calc_minimize()
sphinx_job.executable = 'latest'
sphinx_job.run(run_mode='queue')
vasp_job = pr_ferro.create.job.Vasp(job_name='Fe_min_Vasp', delete_existing_job=True)
vasp_job.structure = structure_fe.copy()
vasp_job.set_encut(450)
vasp_job.set_kpoints([13,13,13])
vasp_job.input.incar["ISMEAR"] = -1      #fermi smearing 
vasp_job.input.incar["SIGMA"] = 0.05 
vasp_job.input.incar["NBANDS"] = 20   
vasp_job.input.incar['LORBIT']  = 11
vasp_job.input.incar["ALGO"]= 'Normal'
vasp_job.executable = '5.4.4'
vasp_job.server.cores = 5
vasp_job.calc_minimize()
vasp_job.run(delete_existing_job=True, run_mode='queue')

This is also a nice example for whoever in the future to compare VASP and SPHINX. Modifications in NBANDS, ISMEAR, SIGMA in VASP and set_empty_states and set_occupancy_smearing is for consistency between both codes.

If you now plot the DOS from both calculations:

plt.plot(fe_vasp_job.get_density_of_states()['grid'], fe_vasp_job.get_density_of_states()['dos'][0], color='blue', label='vasp')
plt.plot(fe_vasp_job.get_density_of_states()['grid'], -fe_vasp_job.get_density_of_states()['dos'][1], c='blue')
plt.plot(fe_sphinx_job.get_density_of_states()['grid'], fe_sphinx_job.get_density_of_states()['dos'][0], c='r', label='sphinx')
plt.plot(fe_sphinx_job.get_density_of_states()['grid'], -fe_sphinx_job.get_density_of_states()['dos'][1], c='r')
plt.axvline(0, color="black", linestyle="dashed")
plt.axhline(0, color="black", linestyle="dashed")
plt.title('Fe DOS')
plt.legend()

you will end up with this:

Fe_DOS_VASP_vs_SPHINX

@ahmedabdelkawy
Copy link
Contributor Author

After #1209 I get this:
Fe_DOS_VASP_vs_SPHINX_after_fix

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants