We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Since y-day, pint 0.11 was released and it results in a new test failure (in addition to the ones in #3778 and #3779):
pint
____________________________ TestVariable.test_pad _____________________________ self = <xarray.tests.test_units.TestVariable object at 0x7f6bfd8c1b20> def test_pad(self): data = np.arange(4 * 3 * 2).reshape(4, 3, 2) v = self.cls(["x", "y", "z"], data) xr_args = [{"x": (2, 1)}, {"y": (0, 3)}, {"x": (3, 1), "z": (2, 0)}] np_args = [ ((2, 1), (0, 0), (0, 0)), ((0, 0), (0, 3), (0, 0)), ((3, 1), (0, 0), (2, 0)), ] for xr_arg, np_arg in zip(xr_args, np_args): actual = v.pad_with_fill_value(**xr_arg) expected = np.pad( np.array(v.data.astype(float)), np_arg, mode="constant", constant_values=np.nan, ) assert_array_equal(actual, expected) assert isinstance(actual._data, type(v._data)) # for the boolean array, we pad False data = np.full_like(data, False, dtype=bool).reshape(4, 3, 2) v = self.cls(["x", "y", "z"], data) for xr_arg, np_arg in zip(xr_args, np_args): > actual = v.pad_with_fill_value(fill_value=False, **xr_arg) xarray/tests/test_variable.py:813: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ xarray/core/variable.py:1210: in pad_with_fill_value array = np.pad( <__array_function__ internals>:5: in pad ??? /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pint/quantity.py:1543: in __array_function__ return numpy_wrap("function", func, args, kwargs, types) /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pint/numpy_func.py:894: in numpy_wrap return handled[name](*args, **kwargs) /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pint/numpy_func.py:671: in _pad kwargs["constant_values"] = _recursive_convert(kwargs["constant_values"], units) /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pint/numpy_func.py:659: in _recursive_convert arg = unit._REGISTRY.Quantity(arg, unit) /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pint/quantity.py:200: in __new__ inst._magnitude = _to_magnitude( _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ value = False, force_ndarray = True, force_ndarray_like = False def _to_magnitude(value, force_ndarray=False, force_ndarray_like=False): if isinstance(value, (dict, bool)) or value is None: > raise TypeError("Invalid magnitude for Quantity: {0!r}".format(value)) E TypeError: Invalid magnitude for Quantity: False /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pint/compat.py:49: TypeError
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this is going to be fixed in #3706 by overriding the test from VariableSubclassobjects
VariableSubclassobjects
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Since y-day,
pint
0.11 was released and it results in a new test failure (in addition to the ones in #3778 and #3779):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: