We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I don't know why, but this test is now failing on Python 2.7 / Windows: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/shoyer/xray/builds/19850608
================================== FAILURES =================================== ______________________ test_infer_cftime_datetime_units _______________________ @pytest.mark.skipif(not has_cftime_or_netCDF4, reason='cftime not installed') def test_infer_cftime_datetime_units(): date_types = _all_cftime_date_types() for date_type in date_types.values(): for dates, expected in [ ([date_type(1900, 1, 1), date_type(1900, 1, 2)], 'days since 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000000'), ([date_type(1900, 1, 1, 12), date_type(1900, 1, 1, 13)], 'seconds since 1900-01-01 12:00:00.000000'), ([date_type(1900, 1, 1), date_type(1900, 1, 2), date_type(1900, 1, 2, 0, 0, 1)], 'seconds since 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000000'), ([date_type(1900, 1, 1), date_type(1900, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 5)], 'days since 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000000'), ([date_type(1900, 1, 1), date_type(1900, 1, 8), date_type(1900, 1, 16)], 'days since 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000000')]: > assert expected == coding.times.infer_datetime_units(dates) E AssertionError: assert 'seconds sinc...:00:00.000000' == 'hours since 1...:00:00.000000' E - seconds since 1900-01-01 12:00:00.000000 E ? ------ E + hours since 1900-01-01 12:00:00.000000 E ? ++++
@spencerkclark please take a look (or we can xfail this if necessary)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I don't know why, but this test is now failing on Python 2.7 / Windows: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/shoyer/xray/builds/19850608
@spencerkclark please take a look (or we can xfail this if necessary)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: