Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
Can you post the code you ran and the results you got for x-dependent porosity? For the non-Bruggeman tortuosity, we need to add that as a separate submodel, please open an issue |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It is just a simple 1C discharge. After changing my parameters to desired values I used the attached porosity profile for the anode via [data]. I plotted both porosity profiles on one plot and it seems that Pybamm interpolation is having a hard time interpolating at both ends and skips the last 2.5 um at both ends although I defined my anode length as 98 um.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
7 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I saw in one of the issues that people tried to define porosity and particle size as a function of x but I have not seen any instruction on how to do that. I defined the porosity as a function x using [data] and a CSV file but when I plot it after simulation, the interpolation function shifts the porosity profile downward meaning I have a smaller average porosity.
Also, I was wondering how I can define the MacMullin number or tortuosity with a customized function (function of porosity) instead of the Bruggeman equation?
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions