Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducibility of treatment effects with random forest and honest trees in final model #252

Closed
Chandrak1907 opened this issue May 20, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@Chandrak1907
Copy link

I appreciate your great work. I am trying to use random forest and honest trees to estimate treatment effect by specifying 'random_state' argument. However, I get different results in each iteration.

Working example with data given in ''Double Machine Learning Examples.ipynb' is here.

And for my specific use case, results differ a lot in each iteration. So, I am curious to know how to trust the treatment effect results.

@kbattocchi
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the very clear bug report, we'll take a look.

@kbattocchi
Copy link
Collaborator

This should be addressed by #258. We're planning to put out a release including these changes next week.

@Chandrak1907
Copy link
Author

models can be saved now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants