We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pulsar have a "command installer" that installs both ppm and pulsar in the PATH.
ppm
pulsar
The problem is that the test (that resides here: https://github.com/pulsar-edit/pulsar/blob/master/spec/command-installer-spec.js) is insanely flaky. For example, it starts with:
apmBinPath = path.join( resourcesPath, 'app', 'apm', 'node_modules', '.bin', 'apm' );
This is not the path anymore that we use. So I commented them for now, and we need a way to actually test the real command instead
🍎 macOS
Any
None
Run tests on CI
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This report is now bundled into a single issue #511
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Thanks in advance for your bug report!
What happened?
Pulsar have a "command installer" that installs both
ppm
andpulsar
in the PATH.The problem is that the test (that resides here: https://github.com/pulsar-edit/pulsar/blob/master/spec/command-installer-spec.js) is insanely flaky. For example, it starts with:
This is not the path anymore that we use. So I commented them for now, and we need a way to actually test the real command instead
Which OS does this happen on?
🍎 macOS
OS details
Any
Which CPU architecture are you running this on?
None
What steps are needed to reproduce this?
Run tests on CI
Additional Information:
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: