Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Listen to all Network Interfaces for discovery #7434

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
Oct 8, 2020

Conversation

nisdas
Copy link
Member

@nisdas nisdas commented Oct 5, 2020

What type of PR is this?

Feature Improvement

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?

This PR defaults to listening to all network interfaces for discovery. Previously we would only bind to a single
interface however that caused issues with virtual networks where that was less straightforward. So a solution
there was to instead determine which network interface a node would bind to when sending out an outbound
packet using UDP as the transport. This however lead to issues with nodes running with dynamic IPs, as
on each IP reset the network interface to bind to would also have changed. This PR instead simply
binds to all interfaces so as to solve issues with network disconnections/resets.

Which issues(s) does this PR fix?

Fixes #7383 , Resolves #7220

Other notes for review

@nisdas nisdas requested a review from a team as a code owner October 5, 2020 09:06
@nisdas nisdas requested review from farazdagi, 0xKiwi and rkapka October 5, 2020 09:06
farazdagi
farazdagi previously approved these changes Oct 5, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #7434 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #7434   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.07%   60.07%           
=======================================
  Files         424      424           
  Lines       30325    30325           
=======================================
  Hits        18219    18219           
  Misses       9115     9115           
  Partials     2991     2991           

farazdagi
farazdagi previously approved these changes Oct 6, 2020
prestonvanloon
prestonvanloon previously approved these changes Oct 7, 2020
@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

I think this is failing e2e tests.

@nisdas nisdas added OK to merge Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review labels Oct 8, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@farazdagi farazdagi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully it will pass the e2e tests!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review
Projects
None yet
3 participants