Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vase Mode: Preview of print is not shown #8216

Closed
2 tasks done
sg-dev1 opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Vase Mode: Preview of print is not shown #8216

sg-dev1 opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@sg-dev1
Copy link

sg-dev1 commented Apr 19, 2022

Description of the bug

When trying to view the preview of the vase mode print shown in the screenshot, the preview is not shown.
Only some gcode commands on the left are shown. The slider on the bottom to view the tool path is also not shown.

Expected behavior is that the preview is shown and the tool path can also be viewed.

vase_mode_print_issue

Project file & How to reproduce

Opening the project in the described version should show the issue shown on the screenshot.

Exporting the gcode and then reimporting it and viewing with the gcode viewer however works (shows the preview properly).

vasemode_print.zip

Checklist of files included above

  • Project file
  • Screenshot

Version of PrusaSlicer

2.4.1+win64

Operating system

Windows 10

Printer model

Custom Config (HyperCube)

@neophyl
Copy link

neophyl commented Apr 19, 2022

#8032 Might want to read that issue.

@sg-dev1
Copy link
Author

sg-dev1 commented Apr 20, 2022

Ok, seems to be the same issue.

I did search for the vase mode tag before, but obviously could not find this issue because it is not tagged as vase mode ...

But thanks anyways for the information.

@sg-dev1 sg-dev1 closed this as completed Apr 20, 2022
@neophyl
Copy link

neophyl commented Apr 20, 2022

It is tagged as vase mode but as it was closed it will only appear in a search if you dont specify open issues only. When searching its always a good idea to include closed ones too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants