Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request / UX Discussion] Support enforcers should work in all modes #5307

Closed
erispe opened this issue Nov 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@erispe
Copy link

erispe commented Nov 28, 2020

Version

PrusaSclier-2.3.0-alpha3

Operating system type + version

Windows 10

Behavior

So this is a request to rethink how Support Enforcers work in regards to the different support modes. The single sentence summary is that a support enforcer should always enforce supports, even if support mode is set to None, because that is what it's name implies. (If the user has enforcers in their scene and wants no supports to show up then they should be disabled by hiding them and setting support mode to None)

I feel like the options "Supports on build plate only" and "Everywhere" or "None" should be the only three options and then you add your support enforcers and blockers on top of that. The "For support enforcers only" becomes redundant. I want I want to be able to use the "Supports on build plate only" together with custom support enforcers, which currently is impossible, and I need to set up a complicated scene in "Supports everywhere" mode where I block everything that's not directly above the build plate.

In summary I think it would be more powerful and cover more use cases if enforcers always work regardless of mode.

@lukasmatena
Copy link
Collaborator

lukasmatena commented Aug 23, 2021

A notification will be shown in PrusaSlicer 2.4.0 (an alpha will be released shortly) to inform about having enforcers with supports turned off.
image

Can we close this issue?

@bubnikv
Copy link
Collaborator

bubnikv commented Sep 22, 2021

no response, closing.-

@bubnikv bubnikv closed this as completed Sep 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants