Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Generate Delamination Layer for Separating Stacked Parts #4041

Open
jason0l opened this issue Apr 10, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@jason0l
Copy link

jason0l commented Apr 10, 2020

It would be great if PrusaSlicer can generate a specified layer where the hotend can do a controlled drop in temperature to a temperature at which the layers delaminate. Controlled delamination layer would really help with separating parts that are printed stacked
image

@rtyr
Copy link
Collaborator

rtyr commented Apr 10, 2020

I believe this is already implemented, because you can easily add custom g-code to the specified layer. For example M104/M109 for temperature, M106 for fan speed, M221 for flow, etc..

CSTM

@jason0l
Copy link
Author

jason0l commented Apr 11, 2020

Thank you. Didn't know I can enter g-code like that.
It would be preferable though to have something a bit more automated that can insert temperature changes early on so that once it starts the delamination layer, the hotend is already on its way reaching the lower target temperature. Same case for when getting back up to temperature. Gradual adjustments to the speed can also compensate for changing temperature in normal printing layers

@jason0l
Copy link
Author

jason0l commented Apr 11, 2020

Although, an issue with PrusaSlicer is that it doesn't like gaps in an entire layer, and it always sees two separate models stacked on top of each other with no separation as one model

@bubnikv
Copy link
Collaborator

bubnikv commented Oct 15, 2020

The gaps will be allowed in PrusaSlicer 2.3.0-alpha1, the error will turn to notification.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants