Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Slic3r should check if users model is merged into purge block - MMU2 #1331

Closed
mylife4aiurr opened this issue Oct 17, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Comments

@mylife4aiurr
Copy link

Bug:
Slic3r should check if purge block is merged with users model in mmu2 prints, and not allow this. Currently slic3r will merge skirt and model into purge block on mmu2 prints and not warn user, so you get this:
Adalinda
Adalinda

This model took more than a day of printing time
@Kuntry3d

1.41.1-rc+win64
Win10

@mylife4aiurr mylife4aiurr changed the title Slic3r should check users model is merged with purge block Slic3r should check if users model is merged into purge block - MMU2 Oct 17, 2018
@AbeFM
Copy link

AbeFM commented Oct 18, 2018

Similarly, the skirt can run under the block - and supports also.

All three should be looked for. The skirt, in particular, can just be set up to include the block. It seems the block size should be calculated, then it added as an object to the bed and the normal pre-slicing checks (and skirt planning) done.

@lukasmatena
Copy link
Collaborator

the normal pre-slicing checks (and skirt planning) done

The "normal" checks do not include (and never included) intersection of objects. This issue is not specific to the wipe tower. Closing as a duplicate of #2501 and #2378

@AbeFM
Copy link

AbeFM commented Aug 26, 2019

One could argue that the block is a special case - since it changes size after hitting slice, it is easier for a build plate to have a failure that is not obvious from the set up screen.

@mylife4aiurr
Copy link
Author

Yea i cant understand why this isnt something the slicer should check 4 and either correct or at least warn about.

@lukasmatena
Copy link
Collaborator

One could argue that the block is a special case

In that case supports are also a special case (they also do not show in 3D view, not even after slicing). Which makes the case not so special.

slicer should check 4 and either correct or at least warn about.

Possibly it should, I'm not arguing about that. We may improve this in future. I just don't think we need another issue to track it, having #316, #1275, #684 and #2598 all open.

@AbeFM
Copy link

AbeFM commented Aug 27, 2019

Agreed. I think your response is adequate: It's not something we do, but we're aware of it.

I'd agree the issue should be closed as it's well captured in existing ones.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants