Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Single Top/ Bottom Perimeter #10346

Closed
TjardF opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Single Top/ Bottom Perimeter #10346

TjardF opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@TjardF
Copy link

TjardF commented Apr 14, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
On surfaces with many features on tight space you get problems with too many Perimeters.
They create ugly gaps between the individual perimeters.
Printing just one Perimeter on Top/ Bottom (selectable maybe with changeable width) would gain lots aesthetic without getting any weaknesses.

Describe the solution you'd like
Maybe like seen on SuperSlicer:
Checkbox:
Top Perimeter
Bottom Perimeter
Numeric Input:
Line width

These create the wanted effect without other changes in the slicing algorithm.

Describe how it would work
the slicing options need to be changed for these layers, shouldn't be that hard in my mind, but didn't looked into PrSl code....

Describe alternatives you've considered
Just a On/Off thing without these additional parameters maybe?

Additional context
Just take a look at these Examples.
I used an old Version of SuperSlicer to show the function of the feature.
Hope its understandable....

Bildschirmfoto 2023-04-14 um 09 49 02 AM
Bildschirmfoto 2023-04-14 um 09 48 48 AM
Bildschirmfoto 2023-04-14 um 09 48 20 AM

Due to PA and plastic flow in reality these gaps tend to be a bit annoying for me, maybe I'm not alone

@sarusani
Copy link

You can add an height modifier (or two for this particular case) and change the amount of parameters for the bottom and top layers that way.

@rtyr
Copy link
Collaborator

rtyr commented Apr 14, 2023

duplicate of #7986.

@rtyr rtyr closed this as completed Apr 14, 2023
@dvomang
Copy link

dvomang commented Apr 22, 2023

Can we reopen this? It seems like something so simple to add that would make a HUGE difference. Looks like the other thread #7986 was also closed.

@rtyr
Copy link
Collaborator

rtyr commented Apr 22, 2023

7986 is open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants