Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BFW-6184] [ENHANCEMENT] Missing option for custom NTP or NTP via DHCP on Mini #3261

Open
ghost opened this issue Sep 10, 2023 · 7 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Improvement proposal based on existing features. known issue Our developers are aware of the issue. They will eventually work on it.

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 10, 2023

Printer type - [MINI]

Is your suggested improvement related to an existing problem? Please describe.
This creates a problem because files already on the SD card have the correct time but anything uploaded over PrusaLink has a date of 1970. This problem makes Prusa Link unusable if you don't allow your devices Internet access.

Describe the expected functionality
Current firmware for the Mini requires Internet access or the printer will not have the correct time.
The firmware does not allow the configuration of a custom (local) NTP server FQDN/IP and it does not support using the NTP provided by DHCP either.
Both options should be supported.

This is a know issue but no one bothered to fix it. https://help.prusa3d.com/article/ntp-server-mini_151132
Hopefully this request will put it on the table.

@ghost ghost added the enhancement Improvement proposal based on existing features. label Sep 10, 2023
@xtomasnemec
Copy link

And maybe also add the non-standard time zones like +5:30 or +5:45

@Prusa-Support
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your suggestions.
However, these partially duplicate existing issues #639, #1779, #2317, #3141.

I suggest closing this one issue and sharing your relevant piece of feedback on the related existing issues.
Scattered feedback over several issues doesn't quite help us track the popularity of the community requests and define development goals accordingly.

Michele Moramarco
Prusa Research

@Prusa-Support Prusa-Support added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists. awaiting response We need more data. UI requests, suggestions, issues related to the User Interface known issue Our developers are aware of the issue. They will eventually work on it. network/data Anything dealing with local or cloud data transfer and processing. labels Oct 7, 2023
@Prusa-Support
Copy link
Collaborator

It seems safe to close this issue as a duplicate of mixed already posted issues.

Michele Moramarco
Prusa Research

@GithubUser2687380
Copy link

How is this solved in the linked issues? There is still no option to use your own NTP server via a setting or DHCP option. In the meantime this looks like a phone-home functionality of the printer since it uses a specific NTP server 195.113.144.238 which resolves to tak.cesnet.cz

Contents of /lib/WUI/sntp/sntp_client.c
`
/* TODO: enable DNS for ntp.pool.org as default sntp server*/

// TMP: ip of Czech CESNET NTP server tak.cesnet.cz
if (ipaddr_aton("195.113.144.238", &ntp_server)) {
    sntp_setserver(0, &ntp_server);
}

`

@danopernis danopernis removed the known issue Our developers are aware of the issue. They will eventually work on it. label Aug 26, 2024
@Prusa-Support Prusa-Support reopened this Oct 12, 2024
@Prusa-Support
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a quite old issue but thanks for the feedback. I guess the issue should stay open for now.

Michele Moramarco
Prusa Research

@CZDanol CZDanol changed the title [ENHANCEMENT] Missing option for custom NTP or NTP via DHCP on Mini [BFW-6184] [ENHANCEMENT] Missing option for custom NTP or NTP via DHCP on Mini Oct 14, 2024
@CZDanol
Copy link
Contributor

CZDanol commented Oct 14, 2024

Internal ticket: BFW-6184

Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to our project. This issue has not received any updates for 60 days and may be considered "stale." If this issue is still important to you, please add an update within the next 7 days to keep it open. Administrators can manually reopen the issue if necessary.

@CZDanol CZDanol self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
@danopernis danopernis added known issue Our developers are aware of the issue. They will eventually work on it. and removed awaiting response We need more data. UI requests, suggestions, issues related to the User Interface network/data Anything dealing with local or cloud data transfer and processing. stale-issue duplicate This issue or pull request already exists. labels Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement proposal based on existing features. known issue Our developers are aware of the issue. They will eventually work on it.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants