Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing Typo #213

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024
Merged

Fixing Typo #213

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

ptorres-prowide
Copy link
Contributor

@ptorres-prowide ptorres-prowide commented Nov 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected a typographical error in the test class name for improved clarity and accuracy.

@ptorres-prowide ptorres-prowide merged commit 7b20cdf into main Nov 15, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@ptorres-prowide ptorres-prowide deleted the ptorres-prowide-Fixing-Typo branch November 15, 2024 21:17
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the renaming of a test class from FieldEnu5mTest to FieldEnumTest in the FieldEnumTest.java file. This change corrects a typographical error in the class name, ensuring it accurately represents its purpose of testing the FieldEnum functionality. The test methods within the class remain unchanged, preserving their original logic and assertions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/FieldEnumTest.java Renamed class from FieldEnu5mTest to FieldEnumTest to correct a typographical error.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82ec241 and 7583c97.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/FieldEnumTest.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/test/java/com/prowidesoftware/swift/model/field/FieldEnumTest.java (2)

7-7: LGTM! Class name typo fixed.

The class name has been corrected from FieldEnu5mTest to FieldEnumTest, which better reflects its purpose of testing the FieldEnum functionality.


Line range hint 9-71: Comprehensive test coverage in place.

The test class has excellent test coverage including:

  • Basic field name validation
  • Field name conversion for valid inputs
  • Invalid input handling
  • Edge cases (case sensitivity, spaces, null)
  • Verification of all enum values

No changes needed to the test methods.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant