Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ruby <2.7now uses WeakMap too, which prevents memory leaks. #8341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2021

Conversation

haberman
Copy link
Member

Ruby <2.7 does not allow non-finalizable objects to be WeakMap
keys: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16035

We work around this by using a secondary map for Ruby <2.7 which
maps the non-finalizable integer to a distinct object.

For now we accept that the entries in the secondary map wil never
be collected. If this becomes a problem we can perform a GC pass
every so often that looks at the contents of the object cache to
decide what can be deleted from the secondary map.

This also changes the way that object pinning works. We pin objects
when they are frozen so they do not forget their frozen state.
Now we implement this with a simple array in Arena, instead of
making it part of the object cache.

Fixes: #8337

Ruby <2.7 does not allow non-finalizable objects to be WeakMap
keys: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16035

We work around this by using a secondary map for Ruby <2.7 which
maps the non-finalizable integer to a distinct object.

For now we accept that the entries in the secondary map wil never
be collected.  If this becomes a problem we can perform a GC pass
every so often that looks at the contents of the object cache to
decide what can be deleted from the secondary map.
@haberman
Copy link
Member Author

haberman commented Feb 25, 2021

Besides not leaking memory any more, this PR also runs the unit tests faster for Ruby 2.5. So I expect improved performance for Rubies prior to 2.7.

@haberman haberman merged commit 80ec787 into protocolbuffers:3.15.x Feb 25, 2021
This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
@haberman haberman deleted the ruby-2.5-gc branch April 20, 2021 18:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants