Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Provide support for Geneva in StatsD metric sink #136

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arielhaim83
Copy link

Fixes #

@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label Nov 10, 2022
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 10, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Comment on lines +22 to +23
appKeySecretFilePath: "" # The path to the secret file
appKeySecretFileName: "" # The file that contains the secret value
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See feature PR

{{- if eq .Values.metricSinks.statsd.formattertype "custom" }}
account: {{ .Values.metricSinks.statsd.account | quote }}
namespace: {{ .Values.metricSinks.statsd.namespace | quote }}
formattertype: {{ .Values.metricSinks.statsd.formattertype | quote }}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should always be added

@tomkerkhove tomkerkhove changed the title Statsd custom formatter support feat: Provide support for Geneva in StatsD metric sink Nov 10, 2022
@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Member

@arielhaim83 Are you planning on updating this one or should we abandon it?

@arielhaim83
Copy link
Author

Basically it's an example of how to use custom formatter and loading a secret from a file directory, I think we should complete this one

@tomkerkhove tomkerkhove marked this pull request as draft January 9, 2023 11:37
@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Let me know when it's ready for review

@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Member

@arielhaim83 Any thoughts on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants