- Open an issue and state your feature request. We will get back to you.
- Read this document, README.md and docs/dev-FAQ.md.
- Ask before opening a pull request. We might not accept your code and it would be sad to waste the effort.
- Respect the Code of Conduct (To date, we never had to intervene - Please keep it that way!)
- Reviews are always welcome.
- Read the code.
- Read the documentation.
- Test whether the documentation matches the code.
- Test Cagebreak in more esoteric setups (many monitors, for instance).
- Compile the code.
- Ideas on improving the testing and quality assurance are particularly welcome.
- You can share your cagebreak scripts and we might include them with Cagebreak provided you agree to release them under MIT and we agree with the use case and coding style.
- If you are happy with Cagebreak under Arch Linux, you may vote for Cagebreak in the AUR.
- The points from the Contributing section above still apply.
Cagebreak is currently developed to fit the needs of its creators.
The feature set is intentionally limited - we removed support for a desktop background image for example.
Nonetheless, don't be intimidated by any other part of this file. Do your best and we will collaborate toward a solution.
Cagebreak supports Arch Linux and uses the libraries versions as they are obtained from extra and core at the time of release.
However, Cagebreak may also work on other distributions given the proper library versions (Some package maintainers have done this and it seems to work.
You should use Arch Linux if you want to modify Cagebreak for yourself.
Project-repo will review your proposal before your implementation for feasibility and desirability. After your pull request, the code will be reviewed in conjunction with all other changes before the release as per the release procedure.
All reviews performed by project-repo are verified by at least two people internally.
On any pull requests please include a
signed-off-by: YOUR IDENTIFIER OR NAME
DCO statement.
By doing this you claim that you are legally allowed to contribute the code and agree to let project-repo publish it under the MIT License.
CAVEAT: This script works exclusively on Arch Linux, which, as outlined above, is the development distribution of Cagebreak.
Cloning the Cagebreak repository and building it is sufficient as a starting point.
All other dependencies can be installed by invoking
meson compile devel-install -C build
if meson is already available or
./scripts/install-development-environment
otherwise.
Cagebreak provides a few convenience tools to facilitate development.
If your fuzzing corpus is located in the directory fuzz_corpus
you can
just call:
meson compile fuzz -C build
If you want to use a different directory, configure cagebreak with
-Dcorpus=OTHERDIRECTORY
or call ./scripts/fuzz OTHERDIRECTORY
.
To facilitate the creation of reproducible man pages an arbitrary release
time has to be set in meson.build
:
meson compile adjust-epoch -C build
If you are on the master branch, everything is ready and you want to create a release tag you can call:
meson compile git-tag -C build
If you want to use another signing key than the prespecified one, configure
Cagebreak with -Dgpg_id=GPGID
.
Hashes of release versions of all binaries can be output to local-hashes.txt
via:
meson compile output-hashes -C build
Creation of signatures for releases can be achieved through:
meson compile create-sigs -C build
Configure Cagebreak with -Dgpg_id=GPGID
for a different gpg signing
key.
Once the version number is set within meson.build, you can use
meson compile set-ver -C build
to set the version number in the man pages and README repology minversion.
Use of the script without meson is discouraged because meson.build is not touched by the script.
The following command generates the release artefacts which must be created once a release is completely ready to be published (the commit is tagged with the version of the master branch, etc.):
meson compile create-artefacts -C build
Use of the script version is discouraged.
Cagebreak should compile with any reasonably new gcc or clang. Consider a gcc version of at least 10.1 if you want to get the benefit of the -fanalyzer flag. However, this new flag sometimes produces false-postives and we selectively disable warnings for affected code segments as described below.
Meson is configured to set CG_HAS_FANALYZE
if -fanalyzer
is available.
Therefore, to maintain portability, false-positive fanalyzer warnings are to be
disabled using the following syntax:
#if CG_HAS_FANALYZE
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "WARNING OPTION"
#endif
and after
#if CG_HAS_FANALYZE
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
#endif
meson test -C build
invokes all tests. This is required for a release to occur.
There are four test suites:
- basic: tests actual outward-facing functionality
- Note optional dependencies for efficient socket interaction
- nc (openbsd-netcat)
- jq
- Note optional dependencies for efficient socket interaction
- devel: tests internal properties of the repository
- Note potentially heavier dependencies such as
- shellcheck
- clang-format
- Note potentially heavier dependencies such as
- devel-long: applies more costly testing
- Note potentially heavier dependencies such as
- scan-build (static analysis (including security-relevant issues))
- Note potentially heavier dependencies such as
- release: tests release specific considerations
- Note that this is only expected to pass just before a release. This checks mostly administrative things to check that a release is ready.
- Note that non-auto tests are files in
release-non-auto-checks
and have to contain the release version and current date in YYYY-mm-dd format on seperate lines. This is our imperfect attempt to guarantee some hard-to-automate checks are carried out before a release is undertaken.
Every commit should pass at least the basic and devel suites.
It is expected that cagebreak passes at least the basic, devel and devel-long suites when commits are pushed:
meson test -C build --suite basic --suite devel
The basic suite can be used to test a binary. This is useful for PKGBUILDs and their equivalents in other systems.
meson test -C build --suite basic
Along with the project source code, a fuzzing framework based on libfuzzer
is
supplied. This allows for the testing of the parsing code responsible for reading
the cagebreak
configuration file. When libfuzzer
is available (please
use the clang
compiler to enable it), building the fuzz-testing software can
be enabled by passing -Dfuzz=true
to meson. This generates a build/fuzz/fuzz-parse
binary according to the libfuzzer
specifications. Further documentation on
how to run this binary can be found here.
Here is an example workflow:
rm -rf build
CC=clang meson setup build -Dfuzz=true -Db_sanitize=address,undefined -Db_lundef=false
ninja -C build/
mkdir build/fuzz_corpus
cp examples/config build/fuzz_corpus/
WLR_BACKENDS=headless ./build/fuzz-parse -jobs=12 -max_len=50000 -close_fd_mask=3 build/fuzz_corpus/
You may want to tweak -jobs
or add other options depending on your own setup.
We have found code path discovery to increase rapidly when the fuzzer is supplied
with an initial config file. We are working on improving our fuzzing coverage to
find bugs in other areas of the code.
Cagebreak offers reproducible builds given the exact library versions specified
in meson.build
. Should a version mismatch occur, a warning will be emitted. We have
decided on this compromise to allow flexibility and security. In general we will
adapt the versions to the packages available under Arch Linux at the time of
release.
There are reproducibility issues up to and including release 1.2.0
. See
Issue 5
in Bugs.md.
All hashes and signatures are provided for the following build instructions.
meson setup build -Dxwayland=true -Dman-pages=true --buildtype=release
ninja -C build
For every release after 1.0.5, hashes will be provided.
For every release after 1.7.0, hashes will be provided for man pages too.
See Hashes.md
For every release after 1.0.5, a GPG signature will be provided in signatures
.
The current signature is called cagebreak.sig
, whereas all older signatures
will be named after their release version.
Due to errors in the release process, the releases 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 did not include the release signatures in the appropriate folder of the git repository. However, signatures were provided as release-artefacts at the time of release. The signatures were introduced into the repository with 1.7.3. The integrity of cagebreak is still the same because the signatures were provided as release-artefacts (which were themselves signed) and the hashes in Hashes.md are part of a signed release tag.
All releases are signed by at least one of the following collection of keys.
- E79F6D9E113529F4B1FFE4D5C4F974D70CEC2C5B (expired)
- 4739D329C9187A1C2795C20A02ABFDEC3A40545F (expired)
- 7535AB89220A5C15A728B75F74104CC7DCA5D7A8 (expired)
- 827BC2320D535AEAD0540E6E2E66F65D99761A6F (expired)
- A88D7431E5BAAD0B6EAE550AC8D61D8BD4FA3C46 (expired)
- 8F872885968EB8C589A32E9539ACC012896D450F (expired)
- 896B92AF738C974E0065BF42F2576BD366156BB9 (expired)
- AA927AFD50AF7C6810E69FE8274F2C605359E31B (expired)
- BE2DED372287BC4EB2213E13A0C743848A638955 (expired)
- 0F3476E4B2404F95EC41600683D5810F7911B020 (expired)
- 4E82C72C6B3E58A7BC4FF8554909F84CA83BB867
- 5AEB1A2EB0D13F67E306AC59DC0CC81BE006FD85
- 438C27DDB5D174673DF4D67B451205B3528C7C63
- 81372DDB8124349F0303B77448D7E2EE3343E3AA
Should we at any point retire a key, we will only replace it with keys signed by at least one of the above collection.
We registered project-repo.co and added mail addresses after release 1.3.0
.
We now have a mail address and its key is signed by signing keys. See SECURITY.md for details.
The full public keys can be found in keys/
along with any revocation certificates.
Cagebreak uses semantic versioning.
There are three permanent branches in cagebreak:
master
(for releases)development
(for polishing code between releases)hotfix
(for small emergent releases, usually up-to-date with master)
Releases are merged to master as per the release procedure, with reasonable exceptions as the situation requires.
The release commit is tagged with the release version.
In the past, our git history did not perfectly reflect this scheme.
The release procedure outlines the process for a release to occur.
-
git checkout development
-
git pull origin development
-
git push origin development
- Arch Build System is up to date
-
meson test -C build/
just to get an overview - Update internal wiki
- Adjust version number in meson.build
-
meson compile set-ver -C build
- Add new files to meson.build or hardcoded testing variable
- Commit changes
-
git push origin development
- Complete relevant documentation
- New features
- tests added and old test scripts adjusted
- man pages
- cagebreak
- cagebreak-config
- cagebreak-socket
- example config
- FAQ.md
- Changelog.md for major and minor releases but not patches
- Check changes for SECURITY.md relevance (changes to socket scope for example)
- Synchronize any socket changes to cagebreak-socket man page
- Document fixed bugs in Bugs.md
- Include issue discussion from github, where applicable
- New features
-
meson compile adjust-epoch -C build
- Commit changes
-
git push origin development
- Testing
- Manual testing
-
meson compile fuzz -C build
for at least one hour
- Adjust Hashes.md - Use
meson compile output-hashes -C build
to add Hashes or aid in repro check - Commit changes
-
git push origin development
- Complete release-non-auto-checks
-
meson compile create-sigs -C build
- Commit and push signatures, hashes and non-auto-check files
-
meson test -C build
passes everything except some release tests -
git add
relevant files -
git commit
-
git push origin development
-
git checkout master
-
git pull --tags origin master
-
git merge --squash development
-
git commit
and insert message -
meson compile git-tag -C build
-
meson compile create-artefacts -C build
-
meson test -C build
THIS MUST PASS WITHOUT ANY FAILURES WHATSOEVER -
git push --tags origin master
-
git checkout development
(merge to development depends on whether release was a hotfix) -
git merge master
-
git push --tags origin development
-
git checkout hotfix
(hotfix is to be kept current with master after releases) -
git merge master
-
git push --tags origin hotfix
- Upload archives and signatures as release assets
- Delete feature branches if appropriate
- Manage package release