We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider this file: Test.3d
extern typedef struct _A A entrypoint typedef struct _B { UINT32 b; } B;
Running this:
.\everparse\everparse.cmd --odir tmp --makefile nmake --makefile_name test.makefile Test.3d --skip_o_rules
A couple of issues:
This produces test.makefile in the current directory rather than in tmp. Is that desirable?
test.makefile
The more significant issue is that the generated Makefile has a cyclic dependence:
$(EVERPARSE_OUTPUT_DIR)\Test.ExternalAPI.fsti.checked : $(EVERPARSE_OUTPUT_DIR)\Test.ExternalAPI.fsti $(EVERPARSE_OUTPUT_DIR)\Test.ExternalTypes.fsti.checked $(EVERPARSE_CMD) --odir $(EVERPARSE_OUTPUT_DIR) --__micro_step verify $(EVERPARSE_OUTPUT_DIR)\Test.ExternalAPI.fsti
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Consider this file: Test.3d
Running this:
A couple of issues:
This produces
test.makefile
in the current directory rather than in tmp. Is that desirable?The more significant issue is that the generated Makefile has a cyclic dependence:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: