Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pre-sve] TC-SU-2.3 fail to start new CASE session with ota-provider #19214

Closed
pankore opened this issue Jun 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

[pre-sve] TC-SU-2.3 fail to start new CASE session with ota-provider #19214

pankore opened this issue Jun 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@pankore
Copy link
Contributor

pankore commented Jun 6, 2022

Problem

Test case ID: TC-SU-2.3
SHA: 425f1fb
Platform: Ameba all-clusters-app
Chip-tool platform: Raspberry Pi
OTA provider platform: Linux ota-provider on rpi4

Steps to reproduce:

  • Commission DUT and OTAP, start OTA transfer by announce-ota-provider command
  • Kill OTA image transfer midway, wait for DUT to time out and check its update state == 1 (idle)
  • Relaunch a new OTAP session, commission new OTAP
  • Start OTA transfer by annouce-ota-provider command

TC-SU-2.3-chip-tool.txt
TC-SU-2.3-DUT.txt

@isiu-apple isiu-apple added the ota label Jun 6, 2022
@isiu-apple
Copy link
Contributor

In TC-SU-2.3-DUT.txt, I do see: chip[SWU] CASE session may be invalid, tear down session. I also see: chip[SWU] Query already in progress.

Are you testing with this change also? #18765

@pankore
Copy link
Contributor Author

pankore commented Jun 7, 2022

@isiu-apple no, #18765 was not included. chip[SWU] CASE session may be invalid, tear down session. I also see: chip[SWU] Query already in progress is not printed when the initial OTA transfer time out, but is printed when it is querying the new OTA provider.

@pankore
Copy link
Contributor Author

pankore commented Jun 7, 2022

Closing this issue as #18765 was not merged at the time of testing. Will test again with SHA that includes the fix and reopen if issue persists. Thanks.

@pankore pankore closed this as completed Jun 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants